Book Ratings

Rate this book
Share your favorites

Book cover
Details
Purchase
New $28.95
Find at Amazon.com

The Gendering of American Politics: Founding Mothers, Founding Fathers, and Political Patriarchy

Mark E. Kann

Reviews

Editorial Reviews

Product Description

America's founding mothers and fathers built gender bias into American politics. This book examines traditional prejudices against women's political participation as well as efforts to overcome these prejudices during a revolutionary era. It inquires into the shifting male hierarchies that kept some men out of politics, admitted others to a limited citizenship, and privileged a few men with leadership authority. It also assesses the impact of the founders' gender bias on modern American politics. The gendering of American poltics began as a compromise between traditional patriarchal ideals that subordinated all women to male authority and revolutionary norms that recognized women's capacity for independence, reason, and patriotism. That compromise was manifested in the doctrine of "republican womanhood" which perpetuated women's exclusion from citizenship but afforded women sufficient educational opportunity and family influence to raise citizens and educate statesmen for the new republic. The gendering of American politics was concluded by a second compromise. The founders often expressed a desire to exclude disorderly men from public life and empower a few heroic men to exercise great leadership powers, but they generally settled for granting weak citizenship to most white family men and supporting elite government by accomplished gentleman legislators.

Member Reviews

Partner Reviews

More than societal sexism

Mark E. Kann's work is important and fascinating. He goes beyond the idea that American politics (especially the presidaency) is the result of general male domination in Western society to argue thath it was specifcally built into the political stuctures of our nascient nationhood. As such, he not only contributes to the discussion around a potential woman president, but he adds nuance to issues of masculinity and presidential politics.

Discussions

Start a new discussion